accessibility__skip_menu__jump_to_main

Full text: 61: Stoffausbreitung in der Nordsee : Modellereignisse des Deutschen Hydrographischen Instituts und des instituts für Meereskunde der Universität Hamburg.

7° 
such a simulation, the contributions which are delivered by the in- 
dividual rivers (represented by the number of the particles sub- 
mitted) are weighted in accordance with the following schedule: 
Rhine/Meuse 
Elbe — 
Weser/Jade 
Tyne 
5Schelde 
Firth of Forth 
Seine 
Humber 
Ems 
Thames 
DHI-Model 
52 
L3 
5. 
6. 
5 
6 
4 
37 
2% 
ä % 
IfMH-Model 
5f & 
21 z 
7% 
71% 
3% 
Rn 7 
Tab. 1: Weighted river inputs, as used in the model simulations 
The weightings used in the DHI model were taken from the data pub- 
lished in "Gütezustand der Nordsee” (DHI, 1984) concerning the total 
load of pollutants over the individual rivers. Owing to the fact 
that the data for each indivudual pollutant temporally very consi- 
derably, the concentrations in the North Sea thus calculated produce 
only an estimate of the pollution load. The IfMH model works with a 
8lightly varying weighting of the sources. 
The results of the simulations with the IfMH model and the DHI-model 
are shown in Fig. 9 und Fig. 10. 
Both models calculate very similar distributions. Accordingly, the 
Netherlands, German, and Danish coastal regions - in other words, 
the eastern part of the North Sea - are constantly burdened with a- 
round au order of magnitude higher pollution concentrations than the 
western part of the North Sea, The unfavourable position and situa- 
tion in the German Bight is further elucidated by the concentration 
near the bottom (Fig. 10b) of the DEI model. 
The irregular distribution of the concentrations is worthy of note, 
about which will be gone into in Chapter 4.2 in more detail. Al- 
though the models differ in some fundamental pre-requisites, never- 
theless the results are very similar. 
Both models neglect different part of the current variability 
present in nature, The DHI model leaves out the long periodical 
variability of the circulation caused by the atmospheric forcing 
deviation of the wind, the IfMH model neglects the mixing effect of 
the tidal current. 
The reason for the, in the main, similar results, is the aforemen- 
tioned prominent significance of the mean circulation for the prob- 
lems dealt with here. The results of the 3-dimensional DHI spreading
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.