5
F. Basan et al.
The comparison calibration method has been used (IEC 60565-1 2020), and the
calibration value is estimated according to:
S =20- 10g 109 (7) +20- 10g ‚o(d) —
out
IR
where Yan is the measured signal level by the receiver, Yu: 18 the applied voltage on
the ITC 1007, d is the separation between the transmitter and receiver, and TRV is
the transmit response voltage of the ITC 1007.
Calibration Uncertainty
The transmitter (ITC-1007) had been calibrated in free field using the reciprocity
method, both in FOT’s tank and in Lake Hornavan, thereby providing traceability to a
primary calibration standard. For the tank experiments, an uncertainty budget was
established following the principles of IEC 60565-1 (2020), ISO/IEC 17025 (2017),
and Hayman et al. (2016).
The main contributions arise from the calibration of the transmitter response, ge0-
metric alignment and distance uncertainty, voltage monitoring, and measurement repeat-
ability. Minor terms (e.g., sound-speed varlation, wetting) contributed <0.5% each.
Combining these components yields a combined standard uncertainty of approx-
imately 2.5% (16), corresponding to an expanded uncertainty of about 5% (26) for
Ihe tank calibration. This value characterizes the acoustic source uncertainty and
provides the link between the secondary free-field calibration and the underlying
primary reciprocity standard.
In addition to this source-related uncertainty, each recorder contributes an indi-
vidual component arising from alignment, orientation, and repeatability of measure-
ments, which is considered separately in the graphical representation of the results.
For the pontoon calibration, the overall uncertainty is expected to differ slightly due
to open-water variability (temperature gradients, rig motion, and ambient noise) but
is of similar magnitude as the tank estimate.
indoor Basin (Tank Calibration)
The indoor basın at FOI is a controlled laboratory environment with stable water
conditions, well suited for repeatable tests. Its dimensions (length 8 m, depth 4 m)
impose limits on the lowest usable frequency, but within the range of approximately
2-10 kHz, reliable free-field conditions could be achieved.
The measurement chain consisted of a projector with known TVR and the recorders
under test, which were positioned at a distance of 2 m from the projector and at a depth
of2 m.