jan Leeuwen et al.
A
‚ol
5%
2
ä
E
3
3
Current State, CWMTI: Channel well mixed tidal influenced
u 2007
Current State, CWMTI: Channel! well mixed tidal influencead
4RSN4* 4RATARA 4904458
+
10.3389/fmars.2023.1129951
B
Current State, CWMTI: Channel well mixed tidal influenced
1
14:
13
Inn
# observations
Ibservations
JEFAS
+ Deltares
IFREMER
RC
Ildenburg
RBINS
a SMHI
A UHH-HZG
‚Jbservations
2009-2014 mean
Model mean !
Model Weiaghted Mean
-IGURE 5
Annual results per model for area Channel Well Mixed Tidal Influenced (CWMTI, area 18): (A) DIN, (B) DIP and (C) Chl. The grey bars denote the
>bservational values per vear, including their standard deviation. Note the low number of observations for DIN and DIP
Supplementary Figures 9-15). Chl results show both large over- and
underestimations. Note that the observational mean over 2009-
2014 for an area may be biased towards the coast and fair-weather
conditions. Limited numbers of observations per year can also
introduce bias for individual areas, e.g. by missing
concentration peaks.
indicators are found in the Scheldt plume (SCHPMI1, SCHPM2),
Meuse plume (MPM), Rhine plume (RHPM), and Seine plume
(SPM), and to a lesser extent in the Elbe plume (ELPM). The
weighted ensemble approach is thus capable of simulating known
coastal gradients.
3.3 Pre-eutrophic state
3.2 Current state
The horizontal distribution of the weighted ensemble results for
che present day for surface winter DIN, DIP and growing season
Chl are displayed in Figure 7. High concentrations are found for all
hree variables in near-coastal and river plume areas, and in the
Southern Bight of the North Sea. Highest concentrations for these
Current State, SNS: Southern North Sea
8 - 85 57
zurrent State, SNS: Southern North Sea
STOMBS SAND SREFOSE SARFUN
The horizontal distribution of the weighted ensemble results for
the pre-eutrophic state (or HS) for surface winter DIN, DIP and
growing season Chl are presented in Figure 8 and as a table in
Appendix G (Supplementary Materials). Offshore results are similar
to the current state results, but coastal areas (typically influenced by
rivers) show consistent lower concentrations for all parameters.
3
Current State, SNS: Southern North Sec
| [5
2010
}
Ih
„A
1
IM
+ observations
Jbservations
°EFAS
deltares
FREMER
RC
Ildenburg
ZBINS
ar SMHI
JHH-HZG '
a Observations
2009-2014 mean
Model mean
Model Weighted Mean
Wi
*
:IGURE 6
Annual results per model for area Southern North Sea (SNS, area 11): (A) DIN, (B) DIP and (C) Chl. The grey bars denote the observational values per
year, including their standard deviation. The scale of subfigure B has been adjusted to show the individual results better: the DIP observational
standard deviation for years 2010, 2011, 2012 was 1.38, 8.94 and 3.45 respectively.
"rontiers in Marine Science
frontiersin.org