Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1872
70f17
angles, which most likely are sky-waves [18]. The transmitter antenna pattern is generally
optimized to transmit the signals horizontally. Therefore, the sky-wave is negligible in
the vicinity of the transmitter, due to the transmitter antenna pattern, even if the receiver
antenna is assumed to be isotropic. The sky-wave becomes stronger at larger distances
where the reflected wave, generated by the transmitter antenna, presents a dependency on
the elevation angle. Thus, having a non-isotropic receiving antenna with a specific pattern
could help in mitigating the influence of the sky-wave.
3.3. Transmitter Instability
MF radio beacons were not initially designed to be used as a stand-alone positioning
system. Therefore, some adaptations and modifications are needed for the hardware on
the transmitter side. In principle, these adjustments, needed to enable R-Mode signals
transmission, could be easily implemented at the sites. Figure 4 presents the generalized
difference in architecture between a standard DGNSS beacon and an R-Mode-enabled radio
beacon. First of all, the MSK modulator must be replaced with an R-Mode modulator, then,
two additional components are required: an R-Mode message generator and a stable and
accurate timing source synchronized with the R-Mode system time. The last component
required is an R-Mode signal monitor. This solution is extremely cost-efficient when
compared to the deployment of a new GNSS satellite.
V
DGNSS
Message
Generator
' RTCM2 MSK
Modulator
—— —— -
Radio Beacon Monitoring
DGNSS
Message
Zenerator
' RTCM2
——
R-Mode
Modulator
R-Mode Tem? ı
Message
Generator ‘ \10 MHz,
1 PPS
4 Time
R-Mode System Time: UTC(n), GNSS
wm — ] =
N z nn
R-Mode Signal Monitoring
Signal
Data
Signal
—— —
Data,
Ranging
Amplifier
Amplifier
Antenna
Tunning Unit
Standard
radio beacon
V
Antenna
Tunning Unit
R-Mode enabled
radio beacon_
Figure 4. Difference between a standard MF radio beacon architecture (above) and the R-Mode-
enabled radio beacon (below).
Nevertheless, the hardware components in the standard radio beacons are not identical.
They differ depending on the country. In general, different manufacturer and different
hardware specifications might be used in different countries. For this reason, transmitter-
side instability effects can be observed for some radio beacons but not for others, even in
che same countrv. As an example, we show in Figure 5 an issue that was identified at the