eg
SOTILLO. M.G.*2. GARCIA-HERMOSA, 1... DREVILLON, M.'.
REGNIER, C.', SZCZYPTA, C.?, HERNANDEZ, F.*, MELET, A.’ , LE TRAON, P.Y.'
Mercator Ocean International, Toulouse, France - *Puertos del Estado, Madrid, Spain - °CELAD, Toulouse, France - “IRD, Toulouse, France
INTRODUCTION
Useful information on scientific quality of the Copernicus
Marine Service (CMEMS) products (such as error levels
for ocean observations, or reliability of delivered forecast/
analysis/reanalysis model products) has to be provided
to end-users in a consistent and effective way. A wide
range of operational oceanography products, such as
remote sensed or in-situ observations, and modelled
outputs, are delivered by the Copernicus Marine Service
for ocean physical, biogeochemical and sea-ice variables.
It is, therefore, a challenge to establish and to implement
required homogeneous product quality (PQ) procedures.
The Copernicus Marine Service relies on PQ metrics and
validation procedures inherited from MERSEA and MyOcean
projects (Maksymezuk, 2016), and follows operational
oceanography'’s best practices, well established within the
GODAE Oceanview/OceanPredict international community
(Hernandez et al., 2015; 2018).
The Copernicus Marine Service product quality assessment
strongly relies on the global ocean coverage provided by
Sentinel and other satellite observations. Marine in situ
observations are our main sources of information on the
ocean and Its “ground-truth”. However, measuring at sea
remains a troublesome technical challenge, and, despite
a general source quantity increase during the last decade,
ın situ observations are still sparse in the global ocean.
Satellite and in situ observations are fully integrated in the
Copernicus Marine Service system and in consequence, the
aumber of valid observations and its evolution in time are
primary key performance indicators and quality metrics.
Modelled products provide Near-Real-Time (NRT) forecasts
and analyses as well as Multi-Year (MY) reanalysis products.
This article provides a synthesis of the Copernicus Marine
Service PQ activities, the current organization and main
user oriented PQ outcomes. PA information is disseminated
to end-users (e.g., PQ metrics delivered through the web
portal, updated in NRT) through highlights along with the
specific PQ documentation for each product available
in the catalogue. The PQ cross-cutting activity is under
continuous improvement, and this paper indeed illustrates
how PQ processes, firstly implemented during MyOcean
Projects, have been standardized and reinforced during the
Copernicus 1 service period (2015-2021). Finally, a brief
overview of main guidelines to enhance PQ activities along
the future Copernicus 2 service phase Is provided
1. PRODUCT QUALITY: STRATEGY,
PROCESSES AND ORGANIZATION
The Copernicus Marine Service relies on a complex set of
observing and modelling systems. Also, the generation and
evolution of the products’ portfolio is characterized by an
increasingly complex data (and software) management
process. Apart from ensuring generation and delivery of its
oroduct portfolio, the Copernicus Marine Service evaluates
with quantitative metrics the scientific quality of its products
and is responsible of Informing end-users about relevant PQ
information. Thus, scientific PO documentation is issued for each
product, and it is delivered alongside products at their release.
To achieve its PQ objectives, CMEMS has outlined a PQ
strategy and has established a product quality assurance
Loop, across the different service elements and common for
all producers. This PQ assurance loop is similar to generally
adopted by other operational ocean and meteorological/
zlimatic services in terms of PQ issues (shown in Figure 1).
User requirements and feedback (applied to all steps)
zome first but they are not shown in the diagram as they
are gathered and guide the production systems evolution.
In one end there are the research and development
activities that support the implementation of new products
within CMEMS including:
- those from production centres (PCs) and inputs from
Service Evolution projects (see Melet and Le Traon,
this issue);
- other research programmes (i.e., H2020, Horizon Europe).