HUESS, V.'. JANDT-SCHEELKE, 5.2, KÄRNÄ, T.?, LAGEMAA, PD.“, LINDENTHAL, A.?,
LORKOWSNI, 1.2, MALJUTENKO . 1."*, NORD, A.°, SCHWICHTENBERG, F.2, SHE, J.', TUOMI, L.?.
Janish Meteorological Institute (DMI), Denmark - ?Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie (BSH), Germany - Finnish Meteorological
ıstitute (FMI), Finland - “Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech), Estonia - Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI), Sweden
The objective of the Copernicus Marine Service Baltic
Monitoring and Forecasting Center (MFC) is to provide a
state-of-the-art operational service with sea state, ocean
physics and biogeochemical conditions of the Baltic Sea.
This requires to operate up-to-date modelling systems
with the best input and forcing data available. Starting
Copernicus 1 contract in 2015, Baltic MFC products were
based on different operational modelling systems provided
by 5 institutes forming the Baltic MFC Consortium. Various
ocean and biogeochemical model systems, as well as
different forcing dataset were used. Our major achievement
over the last six years, has been to successfully harmonize
model systems and forcing dataset used in production.
Also, model codes and forcing dataset had been updated.
As a result, Baltic model products improved significantly to
the benefits of Copernicus Marine Service users.
During this six year period, the model development has
been divided into two phases with respect to the ocean
Model code system. During the first part (2015-2017) the
main development was focused on improving the HIROMB
8005 Model (HBM) ocean-ice system (Berg & Poulsen,
2012). Then, an Intercomparison study between the HBM
and the NEMO (Nucleus for European Modelling of the
Icean; Madec et al., 2019) was performed. The outcome
was a strategic decision in 2017: to phase out the HBM
model system and move toward implementation of the
more widely used community NEMO code as the Baltic
MFC physical ocean model.
During the second phase (2018-2021) all ocean model
development focused on improving the implementation
of the NEMO system for the Baltic Sea area. This was
completed during year 2020, with the upgrade in the Baltic
MFC product catalogue in 2020 where the NEMO model
zubstituted the HBM as the ocean circulation model. The
'mplementation and setup of this new system, called Nemo
Nordic 2.0, is described in more detail in Kärnä et al., 2021.
The best available dataset for the Baltic Sea area is
expected to be used to force the models. This includes
"nformation for river outflow and nutrient loadings, for
which data from the latest updated E-HYPE hydrologicaı
Nodel system (running at SMHI, Sweden) are employed.
For the forecast product, atmospheric forcing data from
the high resolution MetCoOp HARMONIE weather forecasts
are used, with hourly frequency and 2.5 km resolution. For
the multi-year products, data from the brand-new ERA5
global reanalysis (issued by Copernicus Climate Change
Service at ECMWF) are used.
1. MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS FROM 2015 TO 2021
1.1 The Blue and White ocean
Major developments made in the HBM system during the
rst years were on improving sea ice modelling, turbulence
scheme and code modernization. For further details on the
ABM achievements from 2015 to 2017 see description
n Le Traon et al.,, (2017). The Baltic MFC consortium
jecided in 2017 to move toward an implementation of
"he NEMO system.. The NEMO system was introduced in
‘he Baltic Service in the ocean reanalysis product. This
setup was based on NEMO 3.6 and covered the Baltic
3ea and North Sea area with a 2 nautical miles (> 3.7 km)
1orizontal grid and 56 vertical levels. The domain has
"wo open boundaries, one in the western English Channel
and the other between Norway and Scotland. Efforts
‘oward an operational forecast production started in 2018
with a new grid of 1 nautical mile (> 1.85 km) horizontal
resolution for the whole model area. During 2018 and 2019