accessibility__skip_menu__jump_to_main

Full text: Evidence for strong relations between the upper Tagus loess formation (central Iberia) and the marine atmosphere off the Iberian margin during the last glacial period

Upper Tagus loess formation and the marine atmosphere off the Iberian margin 
A 
Table 2. Analytical data for luminescence age calculation: sample codes, radionuclide concentrations, total dose rates, equivalent doses, 
and OSL ages. 
Laboratory code U [ppm]* Th [ppm]*® K [wt.%]” Total dose rate D [Gy/ka]“ Equivalent Dose ED [Gy] Luminescence Age [ka] 
Fuentiduena section 
HUB 470 4.16 + 0.30 9.12+0.97 1.17+0.12 
HUB 471 4.42+ 0.35 12.93+1.16 1.29+0.13 
BT 949 5.86+ 0.60 14.22+2.00 1.48 + 0.15 
BT 950 3.97+0.57 14.57+1.88 1.36 +0.14 
BT 1364 4.48 + 0.39 38.84+1.27 1.40+0.14 
BT 1365 3.81+0.41 11.11+1.37 1.34+0.13 
BT 1366 53.44+ 0.48 13.01+1.48 1.34+ 0.13 
BT 1367 3.88+0.38 8.25+1.25 1.07+0.11 
BT 1368 5.97+ 0.42 10.49 +1.39 0.97+0.10 
A3 section 
HUB 472 
BT 1369 
BT 1370 
BT 1371 
BT 1372 
BT 1373 
BT 1374 
Paraiso section 
BT 1375 
BT 1376 
BT 1377 
BT 1378 
BT 1379 
BT 1380 
BT 1381 
BT 1382 
BT 1383 
BT 1384 
BT 1544 
"Determined by thick source o-counting. 
'Determined by ICP-OES. 
“For total dose rate calculation, cosmic dose rates were considered according to Prescott and Hutton (1994). An interstitial water content of 5 + 3% was used for 
all samples except for samples BT 1375, BT 1381, BT 1383, BT 1384, and BT 1544 (8% + 3%) 
lower values are linked to a group of samples belonging to 
PS-2, the paleosol formed during the lower MIS 3 in Paraiso 
section. All other samples plot below an yır of —1.5*1078 
m’kg7! and lack evidence of a pedogenic influence. The ana- 
Iyzed samples thus reveal a clear pattern of magnetic 
enhancement due to pedogenic effects resulting from climate 
control (Fig. 12, left side). The initial magnetic values of 
loess in central Spain (detrital background susceptibility: 
XB=2.5*107® m’kg”') show a higher dispersion and are 
lower (Fig. 12, right side) than the values at Semlac (Roma- 
nian Banat, Xp =1.6*107’ m’kg”'), which are assumed to 
represent the average geochemical composition of the earth’s 
crust (Buggle et al., 2014; Zeeden et al., 2016). This lowering 
of the background susceptibility very likely resulted from a 
dilution effect through dominantly diamagnetic mineral frac- 
ons dominated by quartz and feldspars as well as calcite or 
dolomite (carbonate contents 30-50%), or even gypsum that 
was inherited from the evaporate marls and Tagus River 
deposits. However, when looking each different loess section 
‚Fig. 13), it becomes clear that the sections start from different 
initial magnetic values between Xg=1.4 and 3.9*107® 
N ’kg-! while showing the same vector for pedogenic enrich- 
ment. The gradient from lower Xp to higher Xp corresponds 
more or less to the gradient shown in Fig. 9, which means 
hat lower Xp values (A3 section) relate to more coarse- 
zrained deposits that were only transported short distances 
ınd are rich in calcite and dolomite. In contrast, higher Xp val- 
Jes (Villarubia section) relate to finer-grained material with 
longer transport distances, which exemplifies the combined 
effect of grain sizes and mineralogical composition (content 
of diamagnetic particles) on magnetic susceptibility. 
Magnetic parameters (Yır, Xra» and s-ratio) plotted for the 
Fuentiduena and Paraiso sections (Figs. 2, 9) reveal follow- 
.ng patterns: (i) marl deposits at the base of the section show 
very low values for all parameters. (ii) Sediments deposited 
during MIS 5 (SU-3 and SU-4) are linked to highest values 
for all magnetic parameters, indicating high contents of fer- 
romagnetic minerals (s. 1.) and superparamagnetic particles. 
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 77.191.167.9, on 05 Feb 2021 at 17:09:02. subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use. available at 
attns'/Aanann cambridoe oraf/carefterms https’ Z/Z/idal araf10 1017 /aııa 20720 "
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.