804
U. Callies et al.: Surface drifters in the inner German Bight
Ocean Sci., 13, 799-827, 2017
www.ocean-sci.net/13/799/2017/
BSHcmod currents averaged over a 5 m depth surface layer.
By contrast, drift simulations based on TRIM output (lm
deep top layer) were performed without taking into account
additional wind effects.
The assumed strengths of either wind forcing or Stokes
drift resulted from trying to achieve an overall eastward dis
placement of simulated drifters that roughly agreed with ob
servations. This approach must not be confused with sound
model calibration, which seems impossible based on the very
limited data available. Models perform differently during dif
ferent periods, and it is hard to distinguish, for instance, be
tween deficiencies in the hydrodynamic model and implica
tions of imperfect atmospheric forcing. Also, independent
data needed for model validation are not available. How
ever, already the simple approach enables an appraisal of how
drifter simulations will depend on a distinction between wind
drag and Stokes drift.
2.2.4 Analysis of 25 h drifter displacements
Comparing simulated trajectories with concurrent observa
tions enables a qualitative assessment of a model’s ability
to reproduce overall drift patterns. However, accumulation
of possibly intermittent simulation errors makes it difficult
to localize the origin of major deviations in either space or
time. Therefore, a series of short-term (25 h) simulations was
started once per day (13:00 UTC) from each drifter’s ob
served location at that time. The short-term simulation errors
were analysed against the backdrop of prevailing winds and
residual currents (see Sect. 2.3).
2.3 Characterization of residual currents on a daily
basis
BSH classifies the residual circulation in the German Bight
(between 53.25 and 55.5° N and between 6.5 and 9.0° E) on
a daily basis, referring to surface currents from BSHcmod.
The classification 1 is performed manually based on subjec
tive assessments of 24 h averages. The small deviation of the
averaging interval from two tidal periods does not affect the
analysed frequency distribution of circulation patterns. Most
frequent are a cyclonic circulation with a pronounced inflow
at the south-western border and outflow at the northern bor
der, a reverse anticyclonic circulation and a category with
variable current patterns. Cyclonic circulations correspond
with what is observed in the long-term mean (see Fig. 2a).
Six specific directional types with currents towards the east,
west, north, south, north-west and south-east play only minor
roles. They are related to strong local winds and for statistical
purposes combined into just one class. Due to topographical
constraints, south-west and north-east patterns do not occur.
Figure 3 includes results of the BSH classifications for the
period relevant in this study.
1 http://www.bsh.de/de/Meeresdaten/Beobachtungen/
Zirkulationskalender_Deutsche_Bucht/index.js
An alternative analysis is based on the 2-D version of
TRIM. Slightly different from the above approach, Callies
et al. (2017) defined residual currents as 25 h means (close
to one lunar day - 24.8 h). A principal component analysis
(PCA) was performed on these residual currents, focusing on
the inner German Bight (east of 6.0° E and south of 55.6° N;
see Fig. 2b) and excluding inshore areas with a bathymetric
depth of below 10 m. Corresponding data are freely acces
sible at Callies (2016). Figure 2b displays the leading mode
of variability (first empirical orthogonal function (EOF); see
von Storch and Zwiers, 1999). The time series of correspond
ing principal component PCi is shown in Fig. 3. The struc
ture of the dominant residual current anomaly pattern (ex
plaining more than 70 % of variability) roughly agrees with
that of long-term mean residual currents in the area of the
white box in Fig. 2a.
3 Results
3.1 Observations
Figure 3 places drifter schedules into the context of vari
able atmospheric winds and marine residual currents. Time
bars show travel times of all nine surface drifters. To facili
tate a synopsis of synchronous drifter movements, the time
coordinate was segmented, subjectively assigning different
colours to periods with different drift behaviour. In this con
text, a continuous daily index was introduced, counting days
since when the first 25 h simulation for drifter no. 5 was
started on 27 May at 13:00UTC (see Table SI). To represent
atmospheric forcing used in BSHcmod and TRIM, respec
tively, simulated 10 m winds at 55° N and 7° E near the cen
tre of the study area are shown together with observations on
the island of Heligoland (54.10° N, 7.53° E). All wind vec
tors represent 25 h means and are plotted at the centre of
the respective 25 h interval starting at 13:00 UTC. The winds
from three different data sources are in reasonable agreement
with each other.
Figure 3 also includes the representation of (a) the subjec
tive classification of daily mean BSHcmod surface currents
and (b) the first principal component (PCi) of 25 h mean cur
rents simulated with a 2-D version of TRIM (see Sect. 2.3).
Positive values of PCi (i.e. amplitudes of the anomaly pat
tern shown in Fig. 2b) indicate a strengthening of the mean
cyclonic circulation; negative values refer to its weakening or
even reversal. Although the two representations of residual
current variability have different roots (different models, sur
face layer vs. vertical means, subjective vs. objective, differ
ent atmospheric forcing), a clear correspondence between the
two representations is discernible. Cyclonic hydrodynamic
regimes and positive values of PCi tend to coincide with
winds from the south-west, while anticyclonic circulations
and negative PCi values are mainly driven by winds from
the north-west (Callies et al., 2017).