accessibility__skip_menu__jump_to_main

Full text : Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) for purification and extraction of silicone passive samplers used for the monitoring of organic pollutants

Environ  Sci  Pollut  Res  (2015)  22:19887-19895

19889

Ô  Springer

Surrogated  and  deuterated  compounds  (Table  1)  were  used
as  performance  reference  compounds  (PRC),  compounds  that
are  spiked  into  the  passive  sampler  prior  to  deployment  and
whose  dissipation  rates  can  be  used  to  estimate  sampling  rates.
Internal  standards  (IS)  were  added  prior  to  extraction  of  samplers ­
  to  compensate  for  variations  during  sample  preparation.
Silica  gel  (Chromabond,  Macherey&Nagel,  Germany)  was
used  as  solid-phase  material  in  the  SPE  clean-up  step.
Instrumentation
Pressurized  liquid  extraction  was  performed  with  an  accelerated ­
  solvent  extraction  system  (ASE  350,  Dionex,  CA,  USA).
Ultrapure  water  was  obtained  from  a  Milli-Q  water  purification ­
  system  (Integral  5  Millipore,  MA,  USA).  Gravimetric
analysis  were  performed  on  a  scale  with  ¿/=0.001  g  (Sartorius,
Germany).
F1PLC-SEC  was  performed  on  a  system  consisting  of  a
F1PLC  pump  (L-6200,  Merck-Hitachi,  Germany),  an  injection
valve  (Rheodyne),  a  column  oven  (Techlab,  Germany)  with  a
Phenogel  column  (5  pm.  50  A,  Phenomenex,  USA),  a  fluorescence ­
  detector  (JASCO,  Japan)  and  a  fraction  collector
(Foxy  200  ISCO,  USA).
Concentration  was  performed  either  with  a  parallel  solvent
concentrator  with  two  backflush  cooling  zones  (Syncore
Q101,  BUCHI,  Switzerland)  or  with  nitrogen.
The  silicone  oligomer  content  was  determined  using  a  total
reflection  X-ray  fluorescence  analyzer  (TXRF  3  Picotax,
Rontec,  Germany).
Analysis  of  PAFls  was  performed  with  a  GC-MS  system
(GC  CP-3800  coupled  to  Varian  1200,  both  Varian,  CA,  USA)
using  a  Varian  Factor  Four  Capillary  Column  VF-5  ms  separation ­
  column  (30-m  length,  0.25-mm  ID,  0.25-pm  film  thickness) ­
  (Varian  Associates,  CA,  USA)  in  selected  ion  monitoring ­
  mode  (SIM).  Flelium  5.0  (Linde,  Germany)  with  a  flow
rate  of  1  mL/min  was  used  as  carrier  gas.  The  injection  was
performed  split/splitless  (split  opens  after  3  min),  with  an  injection ­
  volume  of  2  )iL.  The  temperature  gradient  for  chromatographic ­
  separation  was  as  follows:  start  60  °C  for
0.2  min,  temperature  increase  to  100  °C  in  5  °C/min  steps,
temperature  increase  to  320  °C  in  3.5  °C/min  steps  and  a  final
constant  temperature  for  4  min.  The  injection  was  carried  out
with  a  cold  injection  system  with  a  starting  temperature  of
60  °C,  following  an  increase  of  10  °C/s  to  a  final  temperature
of  280  °C,  The  temperatures  of  transfer  line,  ion  source  and
quadrupole  were  275,  250,  and  40  °C,  respectively.  The  quantification ­
  of  target  analytes  was  performed  with  internal
standards.
Determination  of  chlorinated  hydrocarbons  (CFICs)  was
performed  with  a  GC-MS  ion-trap  system  (GC  CP3800
coupled  to  a  Saturn  2200,  both  Varian,  CA,  USA)  in  the
multi-reaction  monitoring  mode  (MRM).  As  separation  column, ­
  a  FIT  8  (0.22  mm  ID,  25  m  length,  0.22  pm  film

thickness)  (SGE  Analytical  Science,  Milton  Keynes,  UK)
was  used,  with  a  desactivated  pre-column  (2-  to  5-m  length,
0.53-mm  ID)  (Agilent,  Germany).
Flelium  5.0  (Linde,  Germany)  with  a  flow  rate  of  1.3  mL/
min  was  used  as  carrier  gas.  The  injection  was  performed  split/
splitless  (split  opens  after  3  min),  with  an  injection  volume  of
2  pL.  The  temperature  gradient  for  chromatographic  separation ­
  was  as  follows:  start  90  °C  for  1  min,  temperature  increase
to  170  °C  in  10  0 C/min  steps,  temperature  increase  to  290  °C
in  3  °C/min  steps  and  a  final  constant  temperature  for  40  min.
The  injection  was  carried  out  with  a  cold  injection  system  with
a  starting  temperature  of  90  °C,  following  an  increase  of  5  °C/
s  to  a  final  temperature  of  250  °C,  The  temperatures  of  trap,
manifold  and  transfer  line  were  200,  80,  and  280  °C,  respectively. ­
  The  axiale  modulation  of  the  ion-trap  was  4.1  V.  The
quantification  of  target  analytes  was  performed  with  internal
standards.
Optimizing  ASE  parameters  for  silicone  rubber
pre-cleaning
ASE  is  used  for  the  first  time  as  a  pre-cleaning  tool  for  PDMS
strips  in  this  study.  The  release  of  small  polymers  from  silicone ­
  rubber  (oligomers)  by  different  solvents  was  tested  for
eight  solvents  and  combinations,  which  are  used  typically  for
pre-cleaning  (ethylacetate,  acetone,  и-hexane,  mediano  l/л  -
pentane  (1:1),  acetonitrile/methanol  (2:1),  dichloromethane/
acetone  (1:1),  n-hexane/acetone  (1:1  v/v)  and  n-hexane/acetone
  (3:1  v/v))  (Rusina  et  al.  2007;  Schafer  et  al.  2010;  Ezzell
and  Richter  2012;  Smedes  and  Booij  2012;  Allan  et  al.  2013).
Past  studies  investigated  polymer  swelling  in  organic  solvents,
which  lead  to  an  enhanced  fragility  of  PDMS  strips  and  blockage ­
  of  solvent  flow  through  the  ASE  extraction  cell  (Rusina
et  al.  2007;  Shahpoury  and  Flageman  2013).  Thus,  oligomer
release  and  swelling  was  quantified  by  gravimetric  analysis.
Pre-weighted  silicone  strips  (55x90x0.5  mm)  were  folded
into  extraction  cells  (22  mL)  with  glass  fibre  filters  in  the
screw  cap  and  extracted  with  each  solvent  (-mixture)  at
100  °C  using  the  parameters  given  in  Table  2.
After  extraction,  strips  were  wiped  with  a  paper  tissue
(Kimtech,  Kimberly-Clark),  quickly  wrapped  in  preweighted ­
  aluminium  foil  to  prevent  evaporation  of  absorbed

Table  2  ASE  instrumentation  parameters  for  different  experimental
approaches

Temperature  (°C)

Static  time  (min)

Cycles

Solvent  tests

100

10

2

Time  series

100

10-90  (Ю-min  steps)

1

Temperature  tests

75;  100;  125

10

5

All  extractions  were  performed  with  1500  psi  pressure,  50  %  flush  and
5  min  oven  heat
            
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.