accessibility__skip_menu__jump_to_main

Full text : Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) for purification and extraction of silicone passive samplers used for the monitoring of organic pollutants

Ô  Springer

Environ  Sci  Pollut  Res  (2015)  22:19887-19895
DOI  10.1007/s  11356-015-5192-1

RESEARCH  ARTICLE

Accelerated  solvent  extraction  (ASE)
for  purification  and  extraction  of  silicone  passive  samplers
used  for  the  monitoring  of  organic  pollutants
Berit  Brockmeyer *  1  •  Uta  R.  Kraus 1  •  Norbert  Theobald 1

Received:  18  March  2015  /Accepted:  10  August  2015  /Published  online:  21  August  2015
©  The  Author(s)  2015.  This  article  is  published  with  open  access  at  Springerlink.com

Abstract  Silicone  passive  samplers  have  gained  an  increasing ­
  attention  as  single-phased,  practical  and  robust  samplers
for  monitoring  of  organic  contaminants  in  the  aquatic  environment ­
  in  recent  years.  However,  analytical  challenges  arise  in
routine  application  during  the  extraction  of  analytes  as  silicone ­
  oligomers  are  co-extracted  and  interfere  severely  during
chemical  analyses  (e.g.  gas  chromatographic  techniques).  In
this  study,  we  present  a  fast,  practical  pre-cleaning  method  for
silicone  passive  samplers  applying  accelerated  solvent  extraction ­
  (ASE)  for  the  removal  of  silicone  oligomers  prior  to  the
water  deployment  (hexane/dichloromethane,  100  °C,  70  min).
ASE  was  also  shown  to  be  a  very  fast  (10  min)  and  efficient
extraction  method  for  non-polar  contaminants  (non-exposed
PRC  recoveries  66-101  %)  sampled  by  the  silicone  membrane. ­
  For  both  applications,  temperature,  extraction  time
and  the  solvent  used  for  ASE  have  been  optimized.  Purification ­
  of  the  ASE  extract  was  carried  out  by  silica  gel  and  highpressure
  liquid  size  exclusion  chromatography  (HPLC-SEC).
The  silicone  oligomer  content  was  checked  by  total  reflection
X-ray  fluorescence  spectroscopy  (TXRF)  in  order  to  confirm
the  absence  of  the  silicone  oligomers  prior  to  analysis  of  passive ­
  sampler  extracts.  The  established  method  was  applied  on
real  silicone  samplers  from  the  North-  and  Baltic  Sea  and
showed  no  matrix  effects  during  analysis  of  organic  pollutants. ­
  Internal  laboratory  standard  recoveries  were  in  the  same
range  for  laboratory,  transport  and  exposed  samplers  (85-126
  %).

Responsible  editor:  Philippe  Garrigues

G3  Berit  Brockmeyer
berit.brockmeyer@bsh.de
1  Federal  Maritime  and  Hydrographic  Agency  (BSH),
Bemhard-Nocht-Str.  78,  20359  Hamburg,  Germany

Keywords  Silicone  passive  sampler  •  Pressurized  liquid
extraction  •  Accelerated  solvent  extraction  •
Polydimethylsiloxane  •  TXRF  •  Size  exclusion
chromatography  (HPLC-SEC)
Introduction
Passive  sampling,  as  time  integrated  sampling  approach,  is
increasingly  used  for  monitoring  of  organic  contaminants  in
the  water  phase  providing  a  cost-efficient  alternative  to  active
water  sample  collection.  The  basic  principle  of  this  sampling
method  is  the  passive  diffusion  and  absorption  of  hydrophobic
contaminants  from  the  water  phase  into  the  sampler.  A  large
variety  of  non-polar  samplers  have  been  applied  so  far,  among
those  are  semi-permeable  membrane  devices,  low-density
polyethylene  (LDPE)  strip  samplers  and  polydimethylsiloxane ­
  (PDMS)  strip  samplers  (Vrana  et  al.  2005).
Common  characteristics  of  single-phased  passive  strip
samplers  are  their  simple  construction,  low  costs  and  the  possibility ­
  for  re-use  (Rusina  et  al.  2007).  PDMS  strip  samplers
are  often  the  samplers  of  choice,  because  polymer-water  partition ­
  coefficients  (A' pw )  for  many  contaminants  have  been
reported  in  the  literature  (Smedes  et  al.  2009).  Furthermore,
PDMS  samplers  can  absorb  chemicals  with  a  wider  log  K Qw
range  than  LDPE  strips.  In  a  current  comparison  study,  Allan
et  al.  (2013)  tested  PDMS  and  LDPE  strips  for  the  screening
of  a  wide  range  of  chemicals  and  showed  that  PDMS  is  less
discriminating  than  LDPE  with  regard  to  more  polar  substances ­
  such  as  organophosphate  compounds  (OPCs).  PDMS
samplers  have  been  successfully  applied  for  the  monitoring  of
polycyclic  aromatic  hydrocarbons  (PAHs),  polychlorinated
biphenyls  (PCBs),  hexachlorobenzene  (HCB)  as  well  as
OPCs  in  both,  limnic  and  marine  waters  (Smedes  2007;
Schafer  et  al.  2010;  Allan  et  al.  2013).
            
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.