35
Oil Spill identification - Round Robin 20045
3.4 Comparison of compound ratios
Besides the visual comparison of chromatograms and plots of peak
heights or area's of ranges of compounds (e.g. see Fig 6 and 7), all labs
used, to a certain extend, ratio's to improve the foundation of the final
conclusions. A summary of the methods reported is given in Table 2.
Labs
Methods
GC-FID
GC-MS
visual
height or
PW
ratio
visual
height or
PW
ratio
numerical
FID
MS
inspect.
area plots
plots
calc.
inspect.
area plots
plots
calc.
limitations
BMM
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Cedre
X
X
X
X
X
LAS EM
X
X
X
X
X
LVA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NBI
X
X
X
X
X
X
NERI
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NFI
X
X
X
X
X
Petrobas
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
RIZA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Sintef
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
SKL
X
X
X
X
X
X
WRD
X
X
X
X
Table 2
Methods to compare samples a type of ratio calculation is the percentage-weathering (PW) plot.
After normalization on compounds not weathered, the percentage of a
compound in the spill sample compared to the source sample is
calculated for a range of compounds and shown in a sequence based
on retention time. These plots were produced by RIZA and SKL:
Weathering is investigated with help of the PW plot, where the area of each
of the n-alkanes is compared with the average of the area of five unweathered
n-alkanes. For slightly weathered oil samples we use the average area of C17
- C21 and for more highly weathered samples we use C20 - C24.
These plots are very helpful to estimate evaporation and to find
differences in patterns. For examples see Fig. 5 and 19 in this report
and Fig. 19 and 20 in the RIZA report.
Very common is also the calculation of ratios between compounds.
Assuming that a spill and source sample are coming from the same
source, it can be assumed that ratio's between compounds are also
identical, although it must be keep in mind that weathering,
contamination and homogeneity can cause differences.
An example is the calculation of the C17/pristane, C18/phytane and
pristane/phytane ratios from the GC-FID and/or GCMS results.
In this case however the value of these ratio's was limited. First of all
the differences were very small and additionally the ratio's were
influenced by weathering. SKL has applied a calculation to compensate
for weathering, but no conclusions based on the results are mentioned.