accessibility__skip_menu__jump_to_main

Full text : North Sea storminess from a novel storm surge record since AD 1843*

3584

JOURNAL  OF  CLIMATE

Volume  27

Woodworth  et  al.  2011).  Here,  we  focus  on  a  long  sea
level  record  observed  at  the  tide  gauge  of  Cuxhaven,
which  is  located  in  the  southeastern  North  Sea.  Sea
levels  have  been  observed  in  Cuxhaven  since  1843.  Until
1899,  the  measurements  were  taken  as  readings  of  high
and  low  water  levels  4  times  per  day.  Since  then  continuous ­
  curves  were  registered  on  tidal  charts  and  only
the  peaks  were  handwritten  in  logbooks.  Digital  recordings ­
  are  available  since  the  mid-1990s.  To  get  the
full  information  about  the  tidal  curves  before  that  time,
extensive  digitization  works  at  the  German  Maritime
and  Hydrographic  Agency  made  hourly  data  available
back  to  1918.  In  the  present  study  we  combine  both  data
types  (i.e.,  tidal  peaks  and  hourly  observations)  to  get
insights  into  the  history  of  all  available  measurements.
The  datasets  were  carefully  checked  for  outliers,  datum
shifts,  missing  values,  and  time  drifts  in  earlier  studies
(Wahl  et  al.  2010,  2011).  The  overall  quality  was  found
to  be  good.  For  example,  Dangendorf  et  al.  (2013a)
demonstrated  a  high  coherence  of  sea  levels  between  the
Cuxhaven  record  and  12  additional  records  all  located  in
the  German  Bight.
Storm  surges  measured  in  the  region  can  be  decomposed ­
  into  an  external  and  a  local/regional  component;
both  caused  by  meteorological  disturbances  over  the
northeast  Atlantic  and  the  entire  North  Sea  basin,  respectively ­
  (Miiller-Navarra  and  Giese  1999).  Hence,  it  is
reasonable  to  suggest  that  strong  storms  occurring  over
the  northeast  Atlantic  or  North  Sea  region  will  leave
a  fingerprint  in  the  surge  record  of  Cuxhaven.  To  illustrate ­
  the  genesis  of  such  a  storm  event.  Fig.  1  shows  the
meteorological  and  oceanographic  situation  in  the  region ­
  during  January  2007.  In  this  month.  Northern  Europe ­
  was  affected  by  a  series  of  strong  storms  (Fink  et  al.
2009),  leading  also  to  a  series  of  strong  storm  surge
events  (Fig.  1).  In  total  the  long-term  95th  percentile  of
daily  surges  was  exceeded  eight  times  in  only  22  days.
The  genesis  of  storm  surge  events  often  starts  with  a
low  pressure  system  over  the  North  Atlantic  traveling
westward  to  the  larger  Baltic  and  Scandinavian  area.  On
their  way  such  pressure  systems  may  trigger  waves  in  the
deep  ocean  northeast  of  Scotland,  which  then  propagate
into  the  North  Sea  elevating  the  water  levels  in  the
German  Bight  approximately  15  h  later  (Rossiter  1958).
Such  external  surges  may  increase  a  single  high  water
event  by  up  to  1  m  (Bruss  et  al.  2010).  However,  the  most
important  factor  for  the  surge  generation  is  related  to
strong  local  winds  from  northwesterly  directions  blowing ­
  over  the  shallow  shelf  areas  in  the  German  Bight
(depths  <40  m;  along  the  coastlines  <10  m)  occurring
when  the  low  pressure  systems  travel  farther  eastward
into  the  Scandinavian/Baltic  area.  These  winds  cause
an  effect  of  water  pile  up  with  surges  of  up  to  more  than

four  meters.  In  January  2007,  the  meteorological  situation ­
  was  characterized  by  a  strong  pressure  gradient  with
pressure  anomalies  16hPa  below  the  long-term  mean
over  Scandinavia  and  exceeding  it  by  9hPa  west  of  the
Iberian  Peninsula  (Fink  et  al.  2009).  These  conditions
lead  to  the  generation  of  a  series  of  particular  large  surge
events  in  the  German  Bight  (Fig.  1).
To  study  the  long-term  behavior  of  such  storm
events—our  first  aim  in  the  present  study—short-term
periodic  and  long-term  MSL  changes  have  to  be  eliminated ­
  from  the  observational  data  first  (Pugh  2004).  A
common  way  of  separating  tides  from  surges  is  to  apply ­
  a  harmonic  analysis  to  the  raw  data.  However,  this
method  has  two  general  restrictions:
1)  First,  for  a  harmonic  analysis  at  least  hourly  observations ­
  are  needed.  This  restriction  often  hampers
the  evaluation  of  long  tide  gauge  measurements  back
into  the  eighteenth  and  nineteenth  centuries,  since
before  1900  most  observations  are  limited  to  readings ­
  of  tidal  high  and  low  water  levels  (and  times).
2)  Second,  for  tide  gauges  located  in  shallow  continental ­
  shelf  seas  (e.g.,  Cuxhaven),  nonlinear  shallow
water  effects  often  bias  the  harmonic  representation
of  tides,  leaving  unwanted  periodic  constituents  in
values  of  nontidal  residuals  (surges)  (Pawlowicz  et  al.
2002 ).
To  overcome  these  restrictions,  Horn  (1948,  1960)
developed  a  more  sophisticated  technique  that  allows
accurate  predictions  of  the  astronomical  tides  just  on
the  basis  of  tidal  peaks.  The  approach  is  based  on
a  harmonic  representation  of  inequalities  (for  detailed
information  of  different  computation  steps,  see  Miiller-Navarra
  2013),  usually  resolving  the  decomposition  of
tides  and  surges  more  accurately  in  very  shallow  seas
than  the  “traditional"  harmonic  analysis  (Pansch  1989).
The  German  Bight  has  distinct  semidiurnal  tides  and
under  this  assumption  it  is  favorable  to  represent  tidal
high  and  low  water  heights  and  times  as  harmonic  deviations ­
  of  mean  heights  and  intervals.  This  has  also
been  best  practice  in  the  operational  service  of  the
German  Maritime  and  Hydrographic  Agency  for  decades ­
  (Miiller-Navarra  2013).  Additionally,  as  also  mentioned ­
  above  for  the  Cuxhaven  record,  digitized  hourly
observations  are  limited  to  the  period  from  1918  onward.
Horn's  method,  however,  allows  us  to  extend  the  tidal
analysis  back  to  1843  without  being  dependent  on  hourly
data  only  available  after  1918.
After  applying  the  tidal  analysis  to  the  raw  data  of
observational  peaks,  we  generate  a  surge  record  by  subtracting ­
  the  astronomical  tides  from  the  original  signal.
One  should  note  that  there  is  a  difference  between  surges
generated  with  hourly  observations  and  tidal  peaks.
            
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.