Some Ideas on Sea Ice Climate and Navigation in the Baltic Sea
77
and 1993/94 it has to be recognized that in the first season with much less than 50 % of the ice
extents, the mentioned restrict-ions were valid even some days longer (154:150 days). This
may indicate that e. g. the severity of the ice cover in a given region is not that much related to
the ice extent but more to the local ice conditions - perhaps as result of the influence of
navigation on the ice cover (see Table 2).
Results and Conclusions
After a sketch of the development of the winter navigation in the (northern) Baltic Sea, the
possible influence of the ship traffic on the character and dynamics of the ice cover in highly
cruised sea areas has been discussed. It is not only the opinion of the author that there is an
essential influence, which should be somehow considered in models and in the evaluation of
long-term time series on the different aspects of the ice climate of the Baltic Sea.
The so far published period for Ice Phase data (1963/64 to 1979/80) has been extended
backwards to the ice winter 1960/61 and forwards to 1999/2000 from 17 to 40 years. The data
have been used to characterize the ice winters in a more integrated manner by defining a mean
ice extent, which takes into account both, the length and the ice covered area of the different
ice phases reached in an ice season, compared to the single value of its maximum ice extent.
The respective ranking of the ice winters shows differences that must be discussed considering
the different ‘weight’ of the used parameters. In addition, some discrepancies e.g. in comparing
the published data for the maximum ice extent and the occurrence of ice phases became
obvious. Therefore, the presented data have to be considered to be provisionally, and they
must be subject to further negotiations and joint ‘tuning’.
As ‘final idea’ the use of the restrictions to navigation is discussed as possible additional
parameter to characterize the severity of an ice season, as they integrate aspects of the given
ice conditions and the ice navigation. An example was calculated for the five seasons 1991 to
1995. The preliminary result shows that there can be distinct differences between the duration
of special restrictions and the maximum and mean ice extent, which require further detailed
cause study and basic discussion.
Acknowledgement
The author is particularly grateful Dr. N. Schmelzer, German Ice Service, for computing of
some of the new ice phase data.
References
Berglund, R., Kylanpaa, M., 2003. ICEMAP - An Interactive Ice Charting Application for Ice
Services. Paper presented at the 4 th Meeting of the International Ice Charting
Working Group, 3.4.2003, St. Petersburg
HELCOM Recommendation 25/7, 2004. Safety of Winter Navigation in the Baltic Sea Area.
http://www.helcom.fi/Recommendations/en_GB/rec25_7/