Le
I,
ADVANCING EARTH
AND SPACE SCIENCES
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
10.1029/2023JC019937
masses of the Southern Ocean (Karstensen & Quadfasel, 2002) and numerical model results for the North
Atlantic (Marshall et al., 1999).
2.3.1. Kinematic Approach
With the kinematic approach, we calculated the rate at which a water parcel crosses the mixed layer base toward
the ocean's interior (Marshall et al., 1999). This combines the vertical and horizontal velocities from the
OMEGAB3D data set along with associated estimates of MLD. To determine the net subduction rates (Sr) as
defined in Equation 3, we integrated the vertical and horizontal volume fluxes across the instantaneous mixed
layer base over a complete annual cycle using weekly OMEGA3D velocities. Additionally, we accounted for
changes in the mixed layer volume by addressing variations of the MLD over time, which is referred to as
‘“entrainment/detrainment” (Figure 2a).
oh
Sr=—+7W, .‚Vh+w,;
(3)
where h is the mixed layer depth, and @, and w, are the velocity components at the base of the mixed layer.
The resulting positive rates are the subduction rates, while the negatives are the obduction rates. It is important to
stress that no “perfect” assessment of subduction/obduction rates can be based on Eulerian approaches, as true
water mass transformation evaluation would imply tracking the fate of individual water parcel along Lagrangian
ırajectories. Other operational definitions of net subduction have been thus adopted in the literature (see also
Xwon et al., 2013; Marshall, 1997) often limiting to the fluxes across a time-invariant winter maximum mixed
‚ayer (e.g., Buongiorno Nardelli et al., 2018). In those cases, only the exchange rate to the main pycnocline is
considered. Significant differences can be expected with respect to the instantaneous approach followed here,
most likely due to diapycnal processes that occur within the seasonal pycnocline (Kwon et al., 2013; Nishikawa
et al., 2010).
Since OMEGA3D has a different vertical resolution than ARMOR3D, the MLD used for the kinematic approach
needs to be re-estimated. We estimate the instantaneous MLD as the depth at which a density difference of
0.03 kg m is found with respect to the density at the surface (see also Buongiorno Nardelli et al., 2017; de Boyer
Montegut et al., 2004). Then, we compute the volumetric flow rate across the mixed layer base by estimating
separately the contribution of the horizontal, vertical and entrainment terms, respectively. Instantaneous values
are then integrated between December of the previous year and November of the follow-up year to analyze the
interannual variations in the spatial patterns and intensity of the subduction rates. The yearly mean net sub-
duction/obduction rates focus on predefined density bins to identify and track specific water mass changes.
Specifically, as for the volume calculation, we have divided the density range into five isopycnal bins of
0.1 kg m width, covering the density range between 07 = 27.05 and 27.55 kg m *. Using yearly net subduction
estimates we aim at quantifying the amount of water that is transferred from the upper boundary layer to the
interior ocean over one complete destratification/stratification annual cycle (Stommel, 1979).
2.3.2. Thermodynamic Approach
The transfer of water into the thermocline must be supported by the formation of surface water through heat and
freshwater fluxes (Karstensen & Quadfasel, 2002; Marshall et al., 1999). With the thermodynamic approach, this
ıransformation is estimated using the buoyancy fluxes calculated from ERA5. The convergence/divergence of
"his transformation flux yields to creation/destruction of water masses by air-sea fluxes (Marshall et al., 1999). To
quantify the transformation rates, we calculated first the buoyancy fluxes (kg m s7') from the heat and
freshwater fluxes as follows:
bf = —a 2 + BE P)S
(4)
where the coefficient of thermal expansion of seawater (a in °C '), the haline contraction coefficient (ß), the heat
capacity of seawater (c, in J kg‘ °C7') and surface salinity (S) are derived from ARMOR3D data. The surface
net heat flux (0,.. in W m”) and the net freshwater fluxes, expressed as evaporation minus precipitation (E-P in
STENDARTIYO ET
Ay
At