32
Table 2:
Extreme activity values of
artificial radionuclides in fish, in
Bq kg ' wet weight (1999-2006)
Table 3:
Extreme activity values of
artificial radionuclides in Fucus
vesiculosus, in Bq kq ' dry
weight (1999-2006)
Table 4:
Activity values of the naturally
occurring alpha emitting
radionuclide 2 '°Po in Baltic
Sea fish, in Bq kg ' wet weight
(1990-2006)
Species
137 Cs
90 Sr | 239.240p u
241 Am
(flesh)
min.
max.
min.
max.
min.
max.
min.
max.
Herring
0.5
21
0.0028
0.0049
0.000019
0.0000912
0.0000137
0.000143
Cod
0.61
41
0.0015
0.0067
0.000021
0.000021
0.0000186
0.0000186
Whiting
6.5
11
0.0013
0.0020
Mackerel
4.5
4.5
Flounder
1.9
11
0.01
0.047
0.000044
0.000045
0.000157
0.000157
Plaice
0.15
14
0.016
0.016
0.0000201
0.000026
0.0000218
0.000196
Pike
9.2
73
0.0098
0.33
Perch
0.35
12
0.016
0.05
Herring, (edible
parts)
4.6
19
0.011
0.103
137 Cs
1
“Sr
239,240p u
“'Am
“Tc
min.
max.
min.
max.
min.
max.
min.
max.
min.
max.
1.3
66
4
10
0.023
0.12
0.0020
0.0069
8.2
168
Species
2'opo
(flesh)
min.
max.
Mean
Herring
0.19
8.5
1.3
Cod
0.043
1.5
0.41
Flounder
0.26
3.4
1.1
species (herring, cod, whiting and mackerel),
because the analysed samples of the former
may contain more small parts of bones which
have accumulated bone-seeking 90 Sr much
more than fish muscle. The 90 Sr values of
herring analysed as “edible parts” (fish without
head and entrails, i.e. containing larger
fractions of bones) are significantly larger than
those of herring flesh alone. Samples of the
flesh of flat fish also suffer from increased
bone fractions leading to slightly larger 90 Sr
activities.
The radionuclides 239 24 °Pu and 241 Am exhibit
maximum activity values which are even one
to two orders of magnitude lower than those
of 90 Sr; so, they do not have any significance
with respect to the doses caused by fish
consumption.
Table 3 shows the corresponding ranges of
radionuclide activity concentrations in bladder
wrack of the species Fucus vesiculosus.
Practically all of the radionuclides shown
are significantly accumulated from seawater.
Besides 137 Cs and "Sr, the alpha-emitting
radionuclides Pu and Am can also be safely
detected. The dominant sources of Pu
and Am isotopes are global fallout as well
as discharges from nuclear reprocessing
facilities; additionally, 241 Am is slowly in
growing from the radioactive decay of the
beta-emitter 241 Pu, which has originated from
the same sources. The very long-lived beta-
emitter "Tc, which originates from nuclear
reprocessing discharges and has been
measured in samples from Danish waters, is
also accumulated significantly.
The radionuclide which is the most important
with respect to doses caused by fish con
sumption is the alpha-emitting 210 Po, which
belongs to the naturally-occurring radionu
clides. The activity values of 104 samples of
fish flesh collected in the Kattegat and the
Bornholm Sea since 1990 have been summa
rised in Table 4. Maximum values, between
1.5 and 8.5 Bq kg 1 wet weight, were slightly
different between the three species consid
ered in these measurements. The average of
the three mean values is about 0.94 Bq kg 1
wet. In a former evaluation of 210 Po in fish from
Danish waters including the North Sea (Dahl-
gaard 1996) average values of 0.35, 0.65 and
0. 96 Bq kg -1 wet weight were observed for
cod, herring and plaice fillets, respectively.
3C.4.3 Activity ratios
Some of the biota species serve as good
biological indicators of activity concentration
ratios of alpha emitting radionuclides,
1. e. the ratios ^Pu/ 239 ' 24 ^ anc | 24i^ m /
239,24op u Measured results of these ratios
may be compared with values known to
be characteristic for their sources, such as
global fallout or discharges from nuclear
reprocessing. Activity ratios have been
measured within the MORS-PRO monitoring
project in samples of bladder wrack (Fucus
vesiculosus), blue mussel (Mytilus edulis)
and small sprat (Clupea harengus ).These
organisms were analysed as whole body
samples, so the blue mussel samples (small
organisms) mainly consisted of shells. Some
of the measured 238 Pu activity values were
not significant, i.e. their uncertainties were
too large and thereby reported as “less-than”
values, which leads to “less-than” values