84 
• Thickness61_90 Equation_old Equation_new 
A Kamminke99/00 ♦ Karnin99/00 ■ Ueckermunde99/00 
▲ Kamminke00/01 ♦ Karnin00/01 ■ Ueckermunde00/01 
Kamminke01/02 ♦ Karnin01/02 Ueckermunde01/02 
Figure 9.2. Dependence of ice thickness in Szczecin Lagoon on the cold sum in mild ice winters and 
measured ice thickness in the winters of 1990/2000, 2000/01, and 2001/02; 
h = 0.28*K s -0.29 (Sztobryn et al., 1999) - old equation for mild winters 
h = 0.24*K s -0.29 new equation for mild winters 
E 
o 
c 
CO 
CO 
Ci 
c 
o 
<D 
o 
Thickness61 _90 
Karnin96/97 
Karnin02/03 
■Equation_old 
Kam m inke96/97 
Kam m inke02/03 
= Equation_new 
Ueckerm unde96/97 
Ueckermunde02/03 
Figure 9.3. Dependence of ice thickness in Szczecin Lagoon on the cold sum in moderate ice winters 
and measured ice thickness in the winters of 1996/97 and 2002/03; 
h = 0.0006*K S +3.17 Kj A -6.99 (Sztobryn et al., 1999) - old equation for moderate winters 
h = 0.0320*K s +3.37 K s ' A -7.38 new equation for moderate winters 
• Thickness61_90 Equation_old Equation_new 
♦ Karnin95/96 ▲ Kamminke95/96 ■ Ueckermunde95/96 
Figure 9.4. Dependence of ice thickness in Szczecin Lagoon on the cold sum in strong ice winters and 
measured ice thickness in the winter of 1995/96; 
h = 0.02*K s 3a -0.33*K s +3.97*K s 1,2 -5.96 (Sztobryn et al., 1999) - old equation for strong winters 
h = 0.0 15*K s 3/2 -0.27*K s +3.59*K s 1/2 -5.59 new equation for strong winters 
November and December of the above winter seasons, which were separated by longer spells with 
positive air temperatures, the Szczecin Lagoon water did not cool down enough for ice formation to